Critical Bodies
A very simple (growing) list of approaches and theories of the body
the phenomological body of Maurice Merleau Ponty
the practiced body (habitus) of Pierre Bourdieu
the docile, disciplined body of Michel Foucault
the performed body of Judith Butler
the institutionally positioned body of Antonio Gramsci
the erotic body of Audre Lorde
the borderlands body of Gloria Anzaldúa
the bounded body of Sigmund Freud
the oddkin body(s) of Donna Haraway
the maternal body of Julia Kristeva
the material body of Stacy Alaimo
the materialist body of Karl Marx
the materialized body of Karen Barad
the somatic social body of Bryan Turner
the psycho-socio-somatic body of Arthur Kleinman
the affective, biomediated body of Patricia T. Clough
the organless body (BoW) of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari
the assemblaged body of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari
the dividual body of Marilyn Strathern
the fragmented body of Bernadette Wegenstein
the historico-racialized body of Franz Fanon
the subaltern subject’s body of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak
the emergence body of Sylvia Wynter
the lived body in illness of Havi Carel
the patriarchally formed moral-political body of Saba Mahmood
the mindful body of Nancy Scheper-Hughes and Margaret Lock
the extended modal body of Baruch Spinoza
the intercarnational body(s) of Catherine Keller
the volatile body of Elizabeth Grosz
the two bodies of Mary Douglas
the techniques of the body by Marcel Mauss
the tomboy body of Barbara Creed
the nervous system and the body of Michael Taussig
the woman in the body of Emily Martin
the embodied paranoia of Arthur Frank
the fleshed religious body of Mayra Rivera
the reader of the body by Mariam Fraser & Monica Greco
the posthuman body of Rosi Braidotti
the gut writing body of Elizabeth A. Wilson
the autotheorizing body of Maggie Nelson
the bodying event body of Brian Massumi
the viscous porous body of Nancy Tuana
Notes & related touch points —
Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish — “docile body” — “something that can be made; out of a formless clay, an inapt body [from which] the machine required can be constructed” (135). It is “a political anatomy” (138). It is “pliable,” capable of being “manipulated, shaped, trained” (135, 136). “Training” encompasses institutions and the force of their “arrangements,” their “techniques,” and their “mechanics of power,” like prisons, the military, schools.
Julia Kristeva’s subject-in-process